Shareful Invitation: Difference between revisions

From Sharewiki.org
m (veganism and free project introduced as Additional Virtues, liability disc extended, bad users archives introduced, humble moral restrictions subchapter readded)
m (according to the following: ("conditions" removed) + sfulnes abit extended)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[#You|You]] are invited to [[#Co-use|Co-use]] this [[#Good|Good]] according to the following conditions:
[[#You|You]] are invited to [[#Users|Use]] this [[#Good|Good]] according to the following:
= Good's Co-usage preference =
= Good's Co-usage preference =
[[#Users|Users]] are required to tell about this Invitation and its Attachments to anyone asking directly about this Good and to anyone that the Co-user(s) think(s) that by his/her/their Using is-are going to increase [[#Sharefulness|Sharefulness]].
[[#Users|Users]] are required to tell about this Invitation and its Attachments to anyone asking directly about this Good and to anyone that the Co-user(s) think(s) that by his/her/their Using is-are going to increase [[#Sharefulness|Sharefulness]].
Line 344: Line 344:


== Sharefulness ==
== Sharefulness ==
Practice(s) that increase(s) Biospheric Wealth and-or the use of the Shareful Invitation for more Goods.
Practice(s) that increase(s) Biospheric Wealth, the use of the Shareful Invitation for more Goods and-or the Good to be enjoyed by the most people posible.





Revision as of 13:56, 15 September 2010

You are invited to Use this Good according to the following:

Good's Co-usage preference

Users are required to tell about this Invitation and its Attachments to anyone asking directly about this Good and to anyone that the Co-user(s) think(s) that by his/her/their Using is-are going to increase Sharefulness.


Users are also required to allow multiple Using during his/her Use Reasonable Sessions when those new Uses are not disturbing the actual Use purpose that has been agreed with Mediator.

When You request a User to concurrently Use the Good, actual User can accept that being the actual User the grantor of the new User or; do NOT accept that and give the contact details from Mediator to the Interested Public.


Use Dispute Resolution

If there is parallel demand to use this Good, demanders should be booked in the following order:

  1. The one(s) Using it at the moment during his/her/their Reasonable Session.
  2. Owner(s).
  3. The one(s) who co-use's resultant production generate(s), in the most Reproduceable Way, the quicker, the more enhacement(s) to the most and-or more of the Goods Optimal Uses and-or; generate(s) another or more Good(s) offering the same and/or most related and/or accesory type(s) of Optimal Use(s) as the Used Good ones from the nearer and for the longest granted time, located the nearest from the Used Good; and-or proves to have more of the posible Additional Virtues optionally estated by Owner; and-or is with a Restorative User Status because of a previous bad use of that specific Good and-or has a higher Restorative Co-user Status; and-or has been queuing for the Co-use the longest and-or has used that specific Good less time during last week with less Additional Moral Restrictions or Additional Privacy Requirements demanded.
  4. The one(s) who offer a higher % of their Use resultant's production with the Shareful Invitation's terms.
  5. Split the total, the available remaining or what can be reasonably scheduled by Mediator into equal or similar sessions between Interested Public and the living organisms nearby likely to comply with the Shareful Invitation's terms, pseudoreandomly ordering the takings' preference.

Schedulings Management

The Use time or portion's limit per person will depend on the ammount of people who asks for Using the Good next. The more Public booked for sessions and/or portion, the less time to assign for new requests.

The ammount or regularity for assigned schedules should increase or preserve the maximum ammount of future posible Good's Optimal Uses.

It's left up to Mediator(s) whether to move to a future date someone's already booked portion and/or Use reasonable session if another with a higher preference profile requests a portion and/or Using it for the time or part of it that was previously booked by the lower preference profile. When modifying a booked session, Mediator should notify with a reasonable time in advance giving apropiate reasons for minimizing the booked Co-user's inconvenience.


Subscription Based Status

Mediator is bound to put the Good into a Subscription Based Status (where schedules won't be automatically given on request) whenever (s)he gets too little Use requests and the Good is limited enough and hasn't been used by many Public and-or he/she/they get(s) too many request all of a sudden and needs extra time for better organizing the scheduling,

  1. Interested public should add their Use request and their Use purpose for Mediator knowing their planned production.
  2. Information on subscribees ammount and biddings should be made visible for Interested Public.
  3. Information about the minimal critical mass that needs to be reached or the shceduled date for starting Co-using has to be available for Interested Public.


Additional Privacy Requirements

Specific privacy requirements for a Use Reasonable Session have to be previously agreed with Mediator. The privacy requirer should overbid the offers from the other Interested Public who are going to be unable to Co-use it due to a another User Additional Privacy Requirements.


When booked for Use

You will have to optionally choose if you want to keep your Use History for more than one week after Using or NOT and if you want to be contacted:

  1. By other Interested Public,
  2. By other booked Users,
  3. For notifying you on a Mediator change.
  4. For a Mediator's mass invitation for a meeting with other booked Users.

And if you want to remain in the Use History for longer if that is reasonably manageable.



Mediator role's dispute resolution

Mediator's role can be asked to be Passed and Passed to the Interested public according to:

  1. The one(s) with more available and granted time and skills for organizing the scheduling from now on and for increasing Sharefulness through it.

Mediator can call to all booked Users and others from the Use History for arbitration if Mediator reasonably reasonably thinks that they could prove that the actual Mediator is increasing more Sharefulness than the challenger before finally Passing the Mediator role to the one who challenged it.

This changes should be added to the Use History if wanted by the parts and don't disturb further the Optimal or NOT functioning of the Good.


Mediator's Additional Rights and Duties

I, being Using the Good at the present time or not, am a person entitled by the Owner or other previous Mediator to do the following:

  1. Ensure that the Good is not abandoned, lost, mislaid or non accidentally damaged further than a reasonable deteriorating by co-use.
  2. Give, At Cost, You available additional Good's source information I may have.
  3. Add, move and remove co-using's schedules to the Attachment according to this Invitation terms.
    1. Notify with a given reason co-using's unbookings when moving or unbooking them.
  4. Passing the Mediation role to someone else. You may not leave it without previously trying to pass it to the previous Mediator, to a new Co-user or to the Owner.
  5. Collect and invest the Footprint Debt if any.
    1. Collect, if requested by the Owner, the Maintenance costs' fees from Co-users and handle them to Owner(s).
  6. Collect this information from Public interested in Co-using the Good:
    1. Contact details from You that I considered sufficient.
    2. Explanations about why and/or what purpose you want to co-use the Good for resolving posible concurrency.
    3. Acceptance of Your promisory full compliance with the terms expressed in this Invitation.

And acceptance from You about that I have

  1. Assured You that I have the enough & legimitate rights of this Good for Inviting You to Use this Good.
  2. Informed You, as a reasonable person will, about the product liability and supplied You, You paying the costs, with available further source information about the Good You might have asked me for. ex: estimated Good's consumption rate for Your expected Reasonable Session if the Owner(s) required maintenance.
  3. Communicated You clearly this Invitation's content and its Attachment if containing any.

And at anytime, if the Owner declared it moveable and required shipping it back on demand:

  1. Assist the Owner in having it back in a reasonable time if estated that.

And if the Owner required maintenance, insurance or some notifications to be supplied:

  1. Show Me the documents that certify Your suppliance.
  2. Supply them to Me in order to give them to the Owner.


Mediator(s) informational duties disclaimer

The requirement to do the Informational duties does not include a requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates for a work that has been started to Use by You. The requirement finishes when the new User(s) start(s) his/her/their session.


Provisions

Owner(s) & Mediator(s) Liability disclaimer

By accepting to co-use the good, you are accepting you have been reasonably informed by Mediator about the liability risk for the Co-uses you have suggested to Mediator before Co-use.

By accepting to Co-use the Good you are discharging Mediator(s) and Owner(s) from all responsabilities of posible liable incidents that could happen during your Co-use.

Warranty disclaimer

....


Invitation to treat an Unbounded nondeterministic Good

This is just a declared intention of how I'd, ideally, like to share this Good with You.

This is an Invitation to treat which will become a binding(Talk:Shareful Invitation#Binding!talk) agreement between Me and You when you start Using the Good. Owner should enforce rights through a reasonable ammount of the best Alternative Dispute Resolution methodologies available for the specific case before trying enforcing it at a Conventional Court.


Use generated production's rights should just come from and for friendshipness motives and intentions. The Use Dispute Resolution is a preference scale for Public for when the Good is not much abundant and there are too many requests from Public to Co-use it.

Neither the Footprint Debt nor optional Maintenance required tasks, posible Restorative duties, insurance or grants given come as payment for something you have done or You will do in the future. They should never be used neither for a punctual or as any type of preconditions for engaging into a for profit business relationship.

If You are required to treat the Use as something taxable by aplicable law, You are the responsible one to value and keeping the accounting of it, There's NOT a requirement from Owner, Mediator or User to inform You further or advice You about Your Use taxability or not.


By accepting Use you are allowing Mediator to Pass contact details from you to others if your unadequated Good's use results in You being put in a Restorative Use Status or in a Bad User Status.

If You suspect of any unadequated use of a Good by other Public, Co-user, Mediator or Owner You should tell that to the Good's Mediator closer to You and-or to the Maintainers of Bad Users Archives.


Sharefulness' sustainability

Shareful invitation should not be used in any way that directly and-or estructurally decreases and-or could potentially decrease Sharefulness.

Use can't generate sharefulness' decrease. If there's some use for the Good that can harass or-and are discouraging others to Co-use them or to use this Invitation for their Goods, being that use one of the Good's Optimal Co-uses or not, Co-user is not allowed to perform it.

User is neither allowed to Co-use this good for decreasing Biospheric Wealth. Use should not either result in any health decrease of living organisms' that are not decreasing Sharefulness.


Breaching of this provision will qualify as Damages.


Damages

Deteriorating of the Good's Optimal Uses(s) further than the estated to You previous to Your Use are considered Accidental damages and-or on purpose damages and not Co-use.

If some kind of this deteriorating is proven, Owner can optionally require the User to compensate those damages and also the User grant given before co-use can be enforced.

Damages have to be proved that have been proved and tried to be resolved by all the [[Alternative Dispute Resolution|Alternative Dispute Resolution methodologies before using this Invitation for a Conventional Court case.

Accidental Damages

Don't terminate Using rights if Mediator consider that adequate promisory compensation or grant is given.

Unwillingness to compensate an Accidental Damage will be considered Intentional Damages.


Intentional Damages

Automatically terminates Use rights

Biospheric Wealth Damages

Refusals to pay the Footprint Debt before or after Use will be categorized as Intentional Damages.


Damages' compensations

User can be temporarily banned from co-using any type of Good as a penalty for provoking some damages on Sharefulness.

User unwillingness to compensate a damage will automatically result in Co-user getting the Bad User Status as defined in this Invitation.

Permissible Moral Restrictions

Owner(s) and Mediators have the right to ban to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to the said Good, which would be prejudicial to the Owner's honor or reputation.

Humble Moral Restrictions

These are restrictions which are estated by the Owner to be temporarily during his/her/their adptation time to new circumstances provoked by the new context where the Good is which are in some way yet still agressive enough for making him/her/them a little bit uncomfortable. Humble refers to the owner's aceptance that this Shareful Invitation is the most efficient way of sharing, but by claiming these rights he/she is admitting not to be yet mentally ready for the new circumstance, while the effort to fully comply with this terms is not left apart.


Communication of addendums

They should be added at the Attachment.

New Mediator(s)

New Arbitrator(s)

New permissible restrictions

New addendums

New versions of this Invitation

Any changes made to this Invitation text will be dated at the footer part of http://, or any other later url provided at http://, along with a link for seeing latest versions content, differences and modification dates.

Additional information on this Invitation to treat can be found at http://category:Shareful Invitation


Termination of rights

The (Co-)Owner(s) has/have the right to terminate the rights provided to You with this Invitation at anytime with no reason given but letting You reasonably finishing your Co-use session.

You may not use a Good except as expressly provided with this Invitation. Any attempt otherwise to use it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this Invitation.

If some part conflicts with an existent or new conventional law, that part should not have been taken into consideration in the first place.



Attachment

It should be communicated by the Mediator to the interested Public at cost on request. It should contain:

Schedule of bookings

You, if You request so, should be able to know when actual Co-user(s) expect(s) to finish his/her session, the list of Co-using bookings and further contact details from them at cost.

Use History

Useu archive. Sessions from last week should be documented by Mediator. Further records can't be required but can be optionally offered if all parts shown agree to that previously.


Additional Permissible Restrictions

Added by Owner and Passed on by Mediator.

Maintenance

  1. Give or grant before use the same or equivalent quantity of estimated value which is bound to be taken out from the Good due to a Co-use. (I might also require you to have an insurance grant covering posible accidental damges).

Grants can also be formalized with co-user's Hours or other more valuable goods or with another Free currency's(as in http://) backing value that could be usable by the owner without restrictions or further royalties.

Disclaimer: Maintenance is not a Good's replicability requirement.


Maintenance requirement limitations

...

Shareful Waste

The Good has to specifically promoted as Shareful Waste or as Shareful Waste Good and not just as Good or Shareful Good when the required maintenance time exceeds and is going to always exceed an Optimal Co-use Session time given.

Shareful Project

The Good has to be specifically promoted as Shareful Project or as Shareful Project Good and not just as Good or Shareful Good (i.e. Shareful Fruits Project and not Shareful little plant, Shareful house Project and not Shareful construction work training) when the Required Maintenance time now exceeds an Optimal Co-use Session's time given but this Required Maintenance time can decrease in the future and-or if Maintenance is invested in increasing Sharefulness and-or if the Owner(s) granting that the Good's Optimal potential-future value (which will require less maintenance time than the one given to Do-users) is going to be offered Sharefully.


Good's Network Maintenance

Owner(s) may ask You for maintenance tasks of a network the Good is dependant of without the requirement for that network to be shareful.

  • If that network is a Shareful Project:
You are required to do the estated tasks in order to Co-use the Good.


  • If that network is not Shareful Project:
You can, without losing any of the rights provided to You in this Invitation apealing to the Permissible Moral Restrictions, refuse to commit this type of maintenance if You consider that that network (1)is not grantly bound to increase Sharefulness through more than half of its total activity and-or production and-or because You consider that (2)those other network's activities which are not directed to increase Sharefulness are specifically decreasing some of the Good's Optional Co-use(s).

A this type of reasonable refusal for doing Good's network maintenance tasks shall not be in any case a cause of increasing other required maintenance tasks.

You may ask Mediator for asking You for doing other tasks instead, apealing to Your Permissible Moral Restrictions if that reason is not a Virtue choosen by Owner


Additional Virtues

This list of sharefulness' increasing values gives options for:

Owner given rights to Public who prove to have those selected certain values that have some weight if-for Use Dispute Resolution.

User' reason given for not doing a required Good's Maintenance task. Qualifies as a User Permissible Moral Restriction.

Veganism

...


Free project

...


Safest Passing

Requires to Mediator to perform a consultancy in the Bad Users Archive for all Interested Public before Use or any other Passing.


More

For now, see: Talk:Shareful Invitation#Permisible restrictions



Compatible repositories

This is a list of URLs where this Invitation is copied in:

  • ...

mirrors....


These are...



Definitions

This paragraph defines a bit deeper some keywords which will appear starting with a Capital letter in the Invitation.

Good

Some legitimate owned value that is inviting the Public to Use it under the Shareful Invitation's terms.


Owner

The person(s) holding the Good's property rights in the last instance and the first / default Mediator.

Mediator

The person(s) entitled to do this Invitation's Informational duties towards the Public and towards the Owner when requested.

User

Person(s) who is/are using the Good in a sustainable way at a present moment. COoperatively, COllaborativelly, COmplianty with this Invitation and not causing Accidental and-or on purpose damages to it.


Restorative User Status

Person who has the penalty of having to increase Sharefulness in a very active way if he/she wants to have rights over Goods.

Bad User Status

Person who temporarily hasn't any rights over any Good due to some previous Intentional Damage caused and his/her unwillingness to restore it.

Bad Co-users Archives' Maintenance

This is a Project which follows all the Free project's standards unless the first one (It does not produces Free content).

Archives contain Damages caused and contact details from people with the Bad Co-user Status worldwide to be consulted for if when the Safest Passing Permisible Restriction is choosen by the Owner in the most decentralized, privacy safe and efficient posible way.

Activity in this task qualifies as increasing Sharefulness although the most is minimized the need for this task the more Sharefulness there is.


Optimal Use

Uses that are considered the Good's worthiest capacity for generating Sharefulness.


Alternative Dispute Resolution

Further practices than the ones suggested by this Invitation for resolving conflicts outside the conventional courts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolution


You

Rest of people who is not co-using the Good. Also known as Public - Invitee.


Interested Public

People who have shown interest in co-using the Good and are either queeing or booked for a Reasonable Session.


Passing

When a Mediator transfers the Informational duties to another Co-user.

When a User lets the Good to be Co-used by some Interested Public.


Arbitrators

Third parties added by the owner for conflict resolution. They have binding rights when acting on behalf of the Owner and non-binding when on behalf of others. They can optionally use those rights given.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrators

Reasonable session

The Good's maximum time or portion of use per person per session.

Reproduceable way

A way which easily visible to anyone, has transparent procedures and results allowing others to copy and adapt them.

Conventional courts

Places where binding agreements are conventionally enforced to.


Sharefulness

Practice(s) that increase(s) Biospheric Wealth, the use of the Shareful Invitation for more Goods and-or the Good to be enjoyed by the most people posible.


(Increasing) Biospheric Wealth

Practice(s) which are not subjected to the Footprint debt and are noted as Additional Virtues in some parts of the Shareful Invitation because they are enhacing the well-being and flourishing of human and no human richness and life forms' diversity that are likely to like the Shareful Invitation.


Shareful Invitation

Text you can find at http:// and-or at its Compatible Repositories

Additional Information

Additional Information on this Shareful Invitation can be found at http://sharewiki.org/en/Category:Shareful_Invitation