Talk:Value

=Doubts, open questions, piefights= .... value = the ability to use, gift or trade something


 * 1) barter adds "...while paying its footprint debt"
 * 2) sharing: "...sustainably"
 * 3) shareful: "ability to use or the requirement to gift or trade something when you are not using it at some point generating own and others values' increase."

Footprint debt
Is it the paying of a footprint debt a part of the steady state economy principle? (=sharing within the biosphere)

or

Is it just an an exceptionally aplied unofficial patch? (=barter within the biosphere)

SO, should this bits be added to the Top level values' sharing definition?
 * 1) Bad-patchable sharing (or barter): Getting more than nature's ability to replenish which provoques environmental degradation (decreases Biosphere value) should be banned or exceptionally compensated (Footprint debt) like when:
 * 2) Extracting non-renewable resources like fossil fuels and minerals at a faster rate than they can be replaced by the discovery of renewable substitutes.
 * 3) Deposit wastes in the environment at a faster rate than they can be safely assimilated.

Formal high level's values
Adding this differentiation should give to the value's definition a set of non modifyable 'Core human values'-principles' for sharing or for sharing fully at least.