Commons: Difference between revisions

From Sharewiki.org
No edit summary
m (adding interfamily links)
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The terms '''commons''' originates from [[Thomas Moore]], who describes how the commons are bing taken away by fences and private property. In here a common is referred to [[Open Grounds]], fields that are shared among everyone, a group of people or [[communities]]. A common is a good that is shared collectively and not owned privately. It is excluded from private ownership.
{{Commons}}


<cite>"Commons" refers to a particular institutional form of structuring the rights to access, use, and control resources. (...) The salient characteristic of commons, as opposed to property, is that no single person has exclusive control over the use and disposition of any particular resource in the commons. Instead, resources governed by commons may be used or disposed of by anyone among some (more or less well-defined) number of persons, under rules that may range from "anything goes" to quite crisply articulated formal rules that are effectively enforced. </cite> [http://yupnet.org/benkler/archives/12#3 ref]
'''Commons''' are shared resources in which each stakeholder has an equal interest. Resources were seen as ''natural wealth'' before this view disturbed by [[property]] [[conventional law]]. [[Conventional authority]] got through [[conventional convention]]s the most of the ownership rights of the resources in the planet.
<blockquote>
The commons appear when they are in risk -- someone.
</blockquote>


-----------
{{stub}}
# [[Beginning of Capitalism]]
== Origin ==
# [[Tear down the fences]]
# [[Commonism]]
# [[Mesh-network]]


==Digital commons==
The term '''commons''' originates from [[Thomas Moore]], who describes how the commons are being taken away by fences and private property. Later on, it was coined for ''property governed by a number of persons''[[Talk:Commons#1|[1]]] also.
 
'''Commons''' is also used in [[conventional law]] by [[conventional authority]] (i.e. some public domain maps) and by individuals on different subjects but both with the keeping of minimal but some ownership rights than what the commons broadly propose (i.e. gnu.org, creativecommons.org - freedomdefined.org, )
 
Commons is also used for protocols of natural wealth management (i.e. caspian sea gas interestates proposal) and for human organizational practices based in the [[P2P]] network theory, for other socialistic models (i.e. ), and even for some kind of and [[freed property]] initiatiaves (i.e. [[Freed Shareful Invitation]]).
 
== The Commons and Communal Sharing as Priority ==
 
{{quote|http://p2pfoundation.net/Relational_Model_Typology_-_Fiske|
* Communal Sharing
* Authority Ranking
* Equality Matching
* Market Pricing
}}
 
{{quote|http://p2pfoundation.net/Phyles|
''" business-empowered communities: they are not companies linked to a community, but transnational communities that have acquired enterprises in order to gain continuity in time and robustness "''
}}
 
== See also ==
[http://p2pfoundation.net/Commons Commons at p2pfoundation.net]
* [[Shareful]]
* [[Commonism]]
* [[Creative Commons]]
* [[Creative Commons]]
* [[Free Culture]]
* [[Free Culture]]
* [[Wealth of Networks]]


==More info==
 
[[Michael Hardt]], an interview with Hardt about the forthcoming book (co- written with [[Negri]], ''Common Wealth''. ''The common as an alternative to public and private ownership'' [http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-common-as-an-alternative-to-public-and-private-ownership/2008/11/17]
=== Other links ===
{{wikipedia}}
* [http://www.commoner.org.uk/ The Commoner]
* [http://bollier.orgDavid Bollier]
* [http://onthecommons.org On the Commons]
* Interview with [[Michael Hardt]] about the forthcoming book (co-written with [[Negri]], ''Common Wealth''. ''The common as an alternative to public and private ownership'' [http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-common-as-an-alternative-to-public-and-private-ownership/2008/11/17]




=== Video ===
<videoflash>L7jaSjkd0jM|center|200|100</videoflash>
[[de:Gemeingüter]]


[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Commons]]
[[Category:Audiovideos]]
[[Category:Gift]]
[[nomad:Commons]]

Latest revision as of 16:02, 7 March 2018

Commons - related pages - Gifts


Commons are shared resources in which each stakeholder has an equal interest. Resources were seen as natural wealth before this view disturbed by property conventional law. Conventional authority got through conventional conventions the most of the ownership rights of the resources in the planet.

The commons appear when they are in risk -- someone.

This article is a stub. If you have any information for this article, you can help by expanding it.

Origin

The term commons originates from Thomas Moore, who describes how the commons are being taken away by fences and private property. Later on, it was coined for property governed by a number of persons[1] also.

Commons is also used in conventional law by conventional authority (i.e. some public domain maps) and by individuals on different subjects but both with the keeping of minimal but some ownership rights than what the commons broadly propose (i.e. gnu.org, creativecommons.org - freedomdefined.org, )

Commons is also used for protocols of natural wealth management (i.e. caspian sea gas interestates proposal) and for human organizational practices based in the P2P network theory, for other socialistic models (i.e. ), and even for some kind of and freed property initiatiaves (i.e. Freed Shareful Invitation).

The Commons and Communal Sharing as Priority

  • Communal Sharing
  • Authority Ranking
  • Equality Matching
  • Market Pricing


" business-empowered communities: they are not companies linked to a community, but transnational communities that have acquired enterprises in order to gain continuity in time and robustness "

See also

Commons at p2pfoundation.net


Other links

WikipediaW.png Wikipedia has additional encyclopedic information on Commons


Video

<videoflash>L7jaSjkd0jM|center|200|100</videoflash> nomad:Commons