Information via the internet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(added "before you share a question" and "share to deepen a question") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
We're going to talk about the "objective" part of the question. | We're going to talk about the "objective" part of the question. | ||
So, we're '''not''' going to talk here about | So, we're '''not''' going to talk here about general personnal attitudes needed or anything related to that. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 20: | ||
*'''Important''' and coherent: text is related to the title | *'''Important''' and coherent: text is related to the title | ||
*'''Structured''' that means categorised (tag for example), clear (title, sub-title,...): so that anyone can find this information quickly and easily understand the whole message. | *'''Structured''' that means categorised (tag for example), clear (title, sub-title,...): so that anyone can find this information quickly and easily understand the whole message. | ||
*'''Quickly understood:''' visualisation could sometimes help in this context. | *'''Quickly understood:''' visualisation could sometimes help in this context, verify interpretation of the question if necessary. | ||
*'''Relyable:''' with other words: | *'''Relyable:''' with other words: | ||
**Social network (trust): which one? advantages and disadvantages of each one? | **Social network (trust): which one? advantages and disadvantages of each one? | ||
**Easy discussion and trafic: so that the debate can be facilitated: forum, comments,... | **Easy discussion and trafic: so that the debate can be facilitated: forum, comments,...so keep monitoring those. | ||
**Source (= saying where does this information come from). | **Source (= saying where does this information come from). | ||
*'''Original:''' means no repetition with another content somewhere else on the website or on the net, prefer in that case to link with this other content (exept if its short). | *'''Original:''' means no repetition with another content somewhere else on the website or on the net, prefer in that case to link with this other content (exept if its short). | ||
| Line 36: | Line 31: | ||
For further discussion about this subject: [http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/what-are-the-best-practices-in-regard-to-sharing-information-via Discussion] | For further discussion about this subject: [http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/what-are-the-best-practices-in-regard-to-sharing-information-via Discussion] | ||
| Line 42: | Line 36: | ||
If you want to: | If you want to: | ||
* Find precise information: Google with advanced search or Wikipedia with "help" fonction: 5min max. | * Find precise information, neutral (not popular because less relyable): Google with advanced search or Wikipedia with "help" fonction: 5min max. | ||
* Explore a domain or an answer to a general question: | * Explore a domain or an answer to a general question: | ||
**Sites: which ones? | **Sites: which ones? | ||
**Directories: http://www.dmoz.org/ or http://www.ipl.org/ | **Directories: http://www.dmoz.org/ or http://www.ipl.org/ | ||
To read further about this subject: [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/FindInfo.html course] | |||
| Line 52: | Line 48: | ||
* How? | * How? | ||
**Question and apriori answer and then synthesis of the answers recieved | **Question and apriori answer and then synthesis of the answers recieved | ||
**Answer question from others | **Answer question from others | ||
* Where? depends on your level of expertise: | * Where? depends on your level of expertise: | ||
**Initiated: Linked in, Facebook, Twitter,...?? | **Initiated: Linked in, Facebook, Twitter,...?? Others better? | ||
**Expert: Usenet (needs a newsreader)?? | **Expert: Usenet (needs a newsreader)?? Others better? | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 10 January 2012
This page in under construction/ discussion and needs your contribution.
It's about "What's the best way to share information through the internet?"
The general context of this page: Sharing
Introduction
We're going to talk about the "objective" part of the question.
So, we're not going to talk here about general personnal attitudes needed or anything related to that.
Characteristics of high quality information
This information should ideally enable others to gain time by being (by order of importance):
- Important and coherent: text is related to the title
- Structured that means categorised (tag for example), clear (title, sub-title,...): so that anyone can find this information quickly and easily understand the whole message.
- Quickly understood: visualisation could sometimes help in this context, verify interpretation of the question if necessary.
- Relyable: with other words:
- Social network (trust): which one? advantages and disadvantages of each one?
- Easy discussion and trafic: so that the debate can be facilitated: forum, comments,...so keep monitoring those.
- Source (= saying where does this information come from).
- Original: means no repetition with another content somewhere else on the website or on the net, prefer in that case to link with this other content (exept if its short).
- in its content
- in its presentation
For further discussion about this subject: Discussion
If you want to:
- Find precise information, neutral (not popular because less relyable): Google with advanced search or Wikipedia with "help" fonction: 5min max.
- Explore a domain or an answer to a general question:
- Sites: which ones?
- Directories: http://www.dmoz.org/ or http://www.ipl.org/
To read further about this subject: course
- How?
- Question and apriori answer and then synthesis of the answers recieved
- Answer question from others
- Where? depends on your level of expertise:
- Initiated: Linked in, Facebook, Twitter,...?? Others better?
- Expert: Usenet (needs a newsreader)?? Others better?