|
|
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| =Doubts, open questions, piefights=
| | {{Value Talk}} |
| ....
| |
| value = the ability to use, gift or trade something
| |
| | |
| #barter adds "...while paying its footprint debt"
| |
| #sharing: "...sustainably"
| |
| #shareful: "ability to use or the requirement to gift or trade something when you are not using it at some point generating own and others values' increase."
| |
| | |
| | |
| ==Footprint debt==
| |
| Is it the paying of a footprint debt a part of the steady state economy principle?
| |
| (=sharing within the biosphere)
| |
| | |
| or
| |
| | |
| Is it just an an exceptionally aplied unofficial patch? (=barter within the biosphere)
| |
| | |
| | |
| SO, should this bits be added to the Top level values' sharing definition?
| |
| #'''Bad-patchable sharing (or barter)''': Getting more than nature's ability to replenish which provoques environmental degradation (decreases Biosphere value) should be banned or exceptionally compensated (Footprint debt) like when:
| |
| #Extracting non-renewable resources like fossil fuels and minerals at a faster rate than they can be replaced by the discovery of renewable substitutes.
| |
| #Deposit wastes in the environment at a faster rate than they can be safely assimilated.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ==Formal high level's values==
| |
| Adding this differentiation should give to the value's definition a set of non modifyable 'Core human values'-principles' for sharing or for sharing fully at least.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| * [[Value:Making of]]
| |
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property#Fr.C3.A9d.C3.A9ric_Bastiat_-_property_is_value
| |
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiology
| |
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_of_Value
| |
| * http://p2pfoundation.net/P2P_Metrics
| |
| | |
| | |
| *(?)Introduce terms like:
| |
| less abundant
| |
| | |
| Abstract - concret , more abstract - more concret ()high values)
| |
| | |
| | |
| human abstracts, human body
| |
| | |
| =Other values' names=
| |
| They are somehow included in the actual categorization and this namings have been refused:
| |
| | |
| [[Inherent value vs Added value]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsec_value intrinsec], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_value Principle], ethical/moral values, core beliefs (those you may be actively thinking about) and dispositional beliefs (those you may ascribe to but have never previously thought about) doctrinal/ideological (religious, political) values, social values, aesthetic values,
| |
| | |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_stance
| |
| | |
| Taste is a result of education and awareness of elite cultural values;
| |
| | |
| Uniqueness, autentic value instead os original
| |
| | |
| will and desire
| |
| | |
| An aesthetic judgment cannot be an empirical judgement
| |
| | |
| noesis = rational intuitive or instinctive
| |
| | |
| noesis reaches the axioms of axiology
| |
| | |
| Moral(people) and Natural (objects)
| |
| | |
| respective quantities of labor required for their production
| |
| | |
| "Real Value" or "Actual Value."
| |
| | |
| Concrete and abstract
| |
| | |
| Absolute and relative
| |
| | |
| Intrinsic and extrinsic, instrumental
| |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_value_%28ethics%29#Life_stances_and_intrinsic_value
| |
| Whole value
| |
| | |
| Total value
| |
| | |
| total value of the whole value of an object is its total whole value is the sum of the total intrinsic value and total instrumental value.
| |
| | |
| Positive and negative value
| |
| | |
| terminal value, essential value, principle value or ultimate importance
| |
| | |
| market value, use value, liquidity, adquisitve power, ...
| |
| | |
| average ethic or philosophic value and instantaneous ethic or philosophic value.
| |
| | |
| # A personal value system is held by and applied to one individual only.
| |
| # A communal or cultural
| |
| | |
| A realized value system contains exceptions to resolve contradictions between values in practical circumstances
| |
| | |
| An idealized value system is a listing of values that lacks exceptions.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Runaround, part of a science fiction novel by Isaac Asimov, this value system exemplifies a realized value system that is internally consistent and has abstract exceptions
| |
| | |
| Three Laws of Robotics
| |
| | |
| 1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
| |
| 2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
| |
| 3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
| |
| | |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_value
| |
| | |
| Truth or Equality or Creed
| |
| | |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosemiotics
| |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salience_%28neuroscience%29
| |
| Real versus nominal value
| |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethonomics
| |
| | |
| =Previous content=
| |
| '''Value'''
| |
| | |
| What is Value? There are different implementations of value. Is there value in [[trash]]? There are in fact two different concepts of value that answer this question. It is how you value it, what you can do with it and how useful it is to you. But also it is the value that, before dumpstering the food, there already was a process happening of value-creation - people making a profit out of it. Even things that are trash, have a social history of value-creation, even though the food that had been dumpster dived was given no value to by the market-people.
| |
| | |
| This interpretation is use-value and abstract value. Use value is something that you need, for example me getting information and figuring how to wpa on my laptop. From use-value to abstract value is a [[commodification]] / [[fetishisation]] process. This means that you take relations between objects as social relations and the relation between subjects as objectified relations. The labour that you put in making one thing is expressed in money-value. So we don't speak about people doing things, but about the products or things that people have done. What happens when labour becomes the prime determinant from value. How do you value your time?
| |
| | |
| A theory of value is needed to define a society of [[Sharism]]. A new theory of value would be an initial stage of creating sustainable forms of sharing.
| |
| | |
| * Over accumulation
| |
| * Affluence
| |
| * [[David Graeber]] - Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams.
| |
| | |
| Additional propositions to create a 'new' theory of value:
| |
| * [http://www.ethicaleconomy.com/ Ethical Economy]. ''The next economy will be an ethical economy where value is no longer based on labour as in the capitalist economy (nor on land as in the feudal economy that preceded it), but on the ability to construct ethically significant social relations.'' [http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/launching-the-ethical-economy-book/2008/11/03]
| |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[Category:Value metrics]][[Category:Talk pages]]
| |
| | |
| [[de:Wert]]
| |