Yo, je was even iets te snel :) But it's okay now! Guaka 20:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
In order to copy text from Wikipedia it's better if we go back to the GFDL and move to CC-BY-SA as soon as Wikipedia has changed its license. guaka 11:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- I see again the discussion we've had many times already :) but to be quite honest, maybe it would be better to ignore Wikipedia... Not sure yet though, what kind of pages were you thinking of copying? --Robino 11:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know, it looked like you copied something. But in the past hours I've decided to not care anymore, since it's almost certain that Wikipedia will move to CC-BY-SA 3.0 anyway. Enough nitpicking. Just share it! guaka
That's nice! (Just wanted to share that...) :-) --Abundance 19:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
hey i was almost about to delete all strange users from the users list
- go ahead! --Robino 19:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
and see: i edited a page you created.....
if there was references to other pages, i was gonna include them as i did in: http://sharewiki.org/en/Flower
- Why wouldn't you make two subheadings? --Robino 19:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, i'll get brave in placing above the one i see more valuable... jeje.. another option is to go for disambiguation pages,,, never tried but could be if the isue gets harder.... let's try in a page for Value, or for th Sharing page .... to give a 'define it yourself' in a more decetralized way
Hopefully you are fine with this. Also pages on SHE and related will moved, except somebody objects it. Maybe I leave the pages to keep them in categories but move the content. What do you think?